In my previous blogposts Social media influencers and content creators as inspiration for digital protests – IDA and Protests online and offline – IDA I have been searching for the connection between digital and offline activism. My posts have particularly intertwined with themes like participation, feeling of belonging, activism as a community, and the role of influencers and forerunners in activism. In my final post, I will conclude the themes and also focus on the challenges and possibilities that digital activism is facing these days.
Wars, crises, and pandemics have followed one after another in recent years. Times are difficult for many, including civil society. A state of emergency has offered regimes the possibility of shaping (in other words, restricting) civil society to better serve their own purposes. How is civil society doing in a crisis-filled world?
Civic space and civil society
Notions civic space and civil society are sometimes used interchangeably (Biekart et. Al, 2023, p. 4). To understand better the challenges, threats, and possibilities of modern, and digital activism it is important to see the difference between these notions. The notion of civic space comes from the human rights discourses and is defined based on the realization of civic freedoms such as the right of assembly and expression, in the same time civic space is the enabling environment for civil society (Biekart et. Al, 2023, p. 4). The civic space is the working environment for civil society, including activism.
It is difficult to measure how effective, and strong or weak civil society is. In terms of research civic space is easier to explore. As Biekart and Fowler say: Civic space has all the attractions that civil society lacks: it can be “visualized” as bounded, dynamic – a space that can grow or shrink. (2023, p. 28). Civic space is an ever-changing environment and the changes can happen fast. Biekart and Fowler note that in countries in which civic space became more restricted, it was largely due to conservative and/or neo-populist forces gaining presence and space (2023, p.41).
Unpleasant development for civic space happened in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Restrictions made to mitigate the spread of the virus also limited the civic space. This development happened for example in Sri Lanka. During COVID the warnings issued by the authorities such as the curfews, travel restrictions, and restrictions of gatherings made a negative impact on civic space (Fernando, 2023, p. 109). When public events and meetings are halted the space for civil society is effectively restricted.
Threats and posibilities in digital world
Civic space is shrinking in many countries due to restrictions from the government and its officials. Digital activism doesn´t solve the problem because the restrictions extend to the digital world too, many social media services are banned, for example, in Russia. In the digital environment, civic space faces other threats and risks in addition to those that are shrinking the space. Roberts and Karekwaivanane argue that digital disinformation is a direct threat to democracy and to fundamental human rights in Africa, disinformation is deployed by governments as well (2024, p.1). Disinformation is playing an increasing role in distorting elections, inflaming conflict and disrupting crucial policy debates across the continent on issues including vaccinations, immigration, gender and reproductive rights (Roberts and Karekwaivanane, 2024, p.1).
The problem is not limited to Africa, as written previously in IDA-blog in the recent election in the US the flood of misinformation kept pouring in from every direction. Also in this case the misinformation and deceitful messages are often shared by politicians and important figures themselves.
One of the great challenges in the digital civic space is accessibility. If civic space is considered to be the realization of the right of an expression the low accessibility makes it empty. In Mozambique, for example, internet use levels are low especially in rural areas, only 21 percent have access to the internet (Tsandzana, 2024, p.66). People in the low-income countries are not the only ones who have access problems. These issues apply also to elderly citizens and persons with a disability.
For whom digital activism is an option?
As the (digital) civic space is shrinking, especially in countries with conservative regimes and digital accessibility is a problem, especially in low-income countries, it leaves us in a situation where digital activism is an equal option only mainly for the people in high-income countries who are educated enough to know how to pay attention for disinformation. But is it enough that we raise our voices in the digital space?
In my first post, I wrote about online and offline protests. I received a very thoughtful comment on that post, which encouraged us, the people in the Global North to do more than be active in digital channels, and defended the need to commit our physical bodies to the cause. The comment continued: we owe it to ourselves and to those we follow online to act in care and solidarity in the physical realm. After delving into the theme, realising the accessibility problems, challenges with the disinformation and restriction coming from the governments – I think it´s important to keep up the noise in all channels, also in the real world (not just in digital channels), and occupy streets and building while we still can.
Influencers and celebrities
In my post Social media influencers and content creators as inspiration for digital protests – IDA I introduced MrBeast, YouTube-content creator, who is doing global philanthropy through his platform. MrBeast´s focus is on fundraising and donating, but as he is a massively popular figure, we can compare his footprint from a larger perspective as well. Davies says that one thing to consider in assessing MrBeast’s philanthropy is the wider influence he might have on how others engage with giving (2024). Davies is suggesting that MrBeast has a huge opportunity to influence his audience, other social media celebrities and other philanthropists. Social media influencers and anyone with large group of online followers have enormous power. It is easy, and also necessary, to criticize the phenomenon as MrBeast is criticized for the white saviorism. But as Davies argues: MrBeast has chosen to use his vast platform to talk about philanthropy and generosity, when there are many far less positive messages that young people could be getting through their engagement with the internet and social media.
Something inspirational on why to keep fighting!
In my first draft of this blog post I wrote in the end: Add here something inspirational on why to keep fighting! And here we are, in the end of my last post and I don´t know how to inspire us after writing mainly about the threats and challenges of our time. But I found from the book Civil Society Responses to Changing Civic Spaces the definition of civic space. In a world full of humanitarian crises, disinformation and war, the definition of civis space sound like an unreachable dreamland – but definitely something to fight for.
Civic space is the bedrock of any open and democratic society. When civic space is open, citizens and civil society organisations are able to organise, participate and communicate without hindrance. In doing so, they are able to claim their rights and influence the political and social structures around them. This can only happen when a state holds by its duty to protect its
citizens and respects and facilitates their fundamental rights to associate, assemble peacefully and freely express views and opinions. These are the three key rights that civil society depends upon.
Source: CIVICUS 2020
Sounds good, right? So keep up the fight!
Best,
Noora
References:
Biekart, Kees; Kontinen, Tiina; Millstein, Marianne (eds.) (2023): Civil Society Responses to Changing Civic Spaces. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, Rhodri (2024): Good intent, or just good content? Assessing MrBeast’s philanthropyLinks to an external site., Journal of Philanthropy & Marketing, 29(2), e1858.
Fernando, U. (2023) Sandwiched? Sri Lankan Civic Space Amidst a Repressive Regime and a Pandemic. In Biekart, Kees; Kontinen, Tiina; Millstein, Marianne (eds.) (2023): Civil Society Responses to Changing Civic SpacesLinks to an external site. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Roberts, Tony; Karekwaivanane, George Hamandishe (eds.) (2024): Digital Disinformation in Africa-Hashtag Politics, Power and PropagandaLinks to an external site. London: Bloomsbury.
Tsandzana, D. (2024) Disinformation, social media networks and terrorism in Mozambique. In Roberts, T. & Karekwaivanane, G. (eds.) (2024): Digital Disinformation in Africa-Hashtag Politics, Power and PropagandaLinks to an external site. London: Bloomsbury.