Reading time: 4 minutes, 48 seconds.

Not long after the global coronavirus pandemic began, WHO coined the term ‘infodemic’ to refer to the glut of information about the virus, and the difficulty of sorting fact from fiction.  

In response to this, Internews’s project Rooted in Trust aims to “combat disinformation and create effective information exchange between public health agencies, humanitarian organizations and communities affected by COVID-19,” in various countries around the world. These initiatives use different channels and fora to track and respond to audience concerns, rumours and questions with reliable, evidence-based information. The programme has served over 4 million people in the last six months.

As part of the Displacement and Dialogue virtual conference from 5-16 October, the nonprofit media organization invited partners from three of the countries – Lebanon, the Philippines and Colombia – to discuss lessons learned, successes and trends related to the sharing of information in humanitarian contexts, in coronavirus times. Here I will summarise the event from an ICT4D perspective, focusing on the case studies presented from Lebanon and the Philippines.

The session began with Meghann Rhynard-Geil, Humanitarian Director, and Irene Scott, the Global Project Director of Internews, introducing the project. Scott explained how it came about as a response to the ‘infodemic’, and how journalists were often relying on secondary reporting, which can lead to misinformation. She went on to describe the project’s approach, which is to understand and listen to the local community – how and where people access information, who they trust, and where they like to share information. Every locality is different and has different challenges. She emphasized the importance of not making assumptions and to do a ‘reality check’ to ensure any advice given is localized and relevant; for example, the advice may be to wear a facemask, but what if people in that community don’t have access to facemasks?  

Scott then handed over to the speakers from the three partner organisations, who each summarized the project and challenges in their country. They were then asked a series of questions from the hosts, as well as questions submitted by the event participants. I will now summarise the lessons learned from the projects in Lebanon and the Philippines.

Lebanon

Layal Bahnam from Maharat Foundation highlighted the key challenge in Lebanon as being the issue of trust. Before COVID-19, the country was already facing corruption and a political crisis that had created huge public distrust in the government. On top of this, the large number of refugees – mainly Syrian and Palestinian – are not acknowledged when it comes to government messaging.

This distrust led to a lot of misinformation, particularly on social media, and the challenge for Maharat Foundation is to restore trust in media content. Rather than simply responding to comments on social media and fact-checking them, they took a different approach to build trust by providing accurate, evidence-based information via in-depth reporting. But this is not easy, since often the data is not accessible in the first place.

The Philippines

Mikhaela Dimpas from IDEALS explained that in the Philippines, many people were already having difficulty accessing basic needs before the pandemic hit. It’s a challenge to persuade someone to take steps to protect themselves from the virus, when they have mouths to feed at home. The other challenge is a language barrier, since there are many local languages, some of which are only spoken. Not only do people need to express themselves in a language they feel comfortable with, but translations can often lead to misinformation. In addition to this, many people don’t have access to cellphones or the internet, and using online channels would miss out large swaths of the population.

IDEALS uses Community Patrollers; people who are active in their community and who can relay local information, community based rumours and represent community interests. Many of these Community Patrollers are young and, as digital natives they can bridge that gap between the online and offline. They also act as ‘champions’ so that members of their community can ask them about rumours and information they’ve heard.

Based on this local information, IDEALS airs radio programmes and streams them on social media, where the audience can send in questions and rumours can be debunked in real time on the show. They’ve also opened up other channels for people to inform themselves and ask questions about COVID-19, such as messaging apps and a hotline where people can text in their concerns.

Some key takeaways mentioned by the hosts at the closing of the event were that building trust, by continually listening and responding to local communities, is key, and that local languages are very important for this.

From an ICT4D perspective, it was also clear that social media is a place where a lot of rumours and misinformation are spread, but which can also be used to tackle these. However, online channels cannot be used on their own, because there are always groups of people in any given community that don’t use them.

As Irene Scott put it during the event:

While social media is definitely a breeding ground for some rumours – a place where rumours go to spread very quickly and to move from social media to the community – it’s not the be all and end all, and only listening to social media means that you’re always missing a sector of the community.  By only collecting rumours from social media we’re excluding them from the conversation and we’re saying that we don’t want to listen to their opinion.

Irene Scott, Global Project Director, Rooted in Trust

It’s therefore important to understand where local people are communicating, meet them through the channels they feel comfortable with, while also bridging the gap between the online and the offline, to reach as many people as possible and ultimately, save lives.  

Do you know of any other ways to combat rumours using ICT? Please let us know in the comments.

This post is written by Jessica Wright. Find out more about the authors of this blog.

9 Comments

  1. ICTs works as accelerators. So, in my opinion, rather than combatting rumours, ICTs can work the other way around and accelerate them. It is important to take control and get ahead of misinformation. Personally, I believe that it is very difficult to stop or minimize the rumours if sufficient information is not provided by the governments before these rumours are spread.

    Alpi
    1. Many thanks Alpi for your comment. I agree that social media in particular can fuel rumours as well as being used to counter them – particularly because they create a kind of ‘bubble’ where people hear what they want to hear. It’s important for governments to provide information as quickly as possible, but I thought the Lebanon case was interesting – where there is so little trust in the government due to the political situation, that it was not seen as a reliable source of information in the first place.

      Jessica
  2. Hey Jessica, I think each case is different. The countries you have chosen, have different problems and therefore other difficulties and results. As you have quoted, social media is definitely a breeding ground for some rumours, but so is real life. People should get information from various sources and critically analyze those information to detect misinformation. I also believe that the governments play a big role here. They should be the sources of accurate information. However, corruption does not help for citizens to trust and believe to the government. It is a controversial topic but I believe that transparency lies at the center of these issues.

    Adriana
    1. Thank you so much for your comment Adriana. Yes, there was definitely a big difference between the country case studies presented, with very different contexts and challenges. I like your idea of transparency being the common thread that can connect and hopefully combat these issues, and certainly in Lebanon it seemed that transparency – in this case, evidence-based reporting allowing the reader to go back to the source of the information – was key.

      Jessica
  3. Communicating during emergency requires different methods and approaches than in a normal operating environment. The organizations who will provide information should try to be the first one to give necessary information. Otherwise, rumors spread and it becomes hard to identify which information is accurate and which is not. Next to this, built transparency is also important since it helps to trust those organizations. For instance, in the case of Lebanon, the country has been facing corruption and political crisis longer than it can be imagined. The public distrust to government shows the possibility of the public not believing in the information the government provides. I cannot really say that I know ways to combat rumors using ICT. But I can definitely say that to prevent those rumors, it is important to be the first.

    Aygen Töre
    1. Many thanks Aygen for your comment. The importance of being the first to communicate in an emergency is something I have learned through the comments here, so it is very helpful! I hadn’t thought of that, but it makes sense. The problem arises in those cases where the government or relevant organisations have been slow to respond and are not the first; then, how do you break down those rumours and combat them? It seems this is much harder, and although the organisations featured in the event were clearly doing some very important and interesting work, I got the sense that it was very much still in progress and there was still a lot of work to be done. Thanks again!

      Jessica
    1. Thank you Rebeka for the article! Very interesting, and I like the idea of using webinars and technology like U-Report to communicate with local communities and dispel rumours. A good read!

      Jessica
  4. Pingback: Blockchain: Turning data into knowledge - Decoding Data for Development

Comments are closed.